| 不同合作模式下考虑风险规避的低碳供应链决策模型 |
| Low-Carbon Supply Chain Decision-Making Model Considering Risk Aversion under Different Cooperation Modes |
| 摘要点击 78 全文点击 0 投稿时间：2025-11-17 修订日期：2026-06-15 |
| 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 低碳供应链;风险规避;合作模式;碳减排;博弈论 |
| 英文关键词 low-carbon supply chain; risk aversion; cooperation mode; carbon emission reduction; game theory |
| 基金项目 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71972172)；教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(24YJA630118)；浙江省社科领军人才培育专项课题(23QNYC12ZD)；“中国计量大学‘一带一路’区域标准化研究中心”课题(BRZK02A). |
| 投稿方向 低碳供应链 |
| 作者 | 单位 | 邮编 | | 杨玉香* | 中国计量大学 经济与管理学院 | 310018 | | 戈乐 | 东南大学 经济管理学院 | | | 邱俊 | 四川大学 商学院
四川大学 商学院 | |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 考虑制造商对投资减排技术具有风险规避行为下,制造商与零售商在不同领域间的合作有利于改善供应链环境绩效。因此,根据合作程度的不同,将合作模式分为如下三种：供应链成员无合作、低碳促销单领域合作以及减排定价双领域合作,构建制造商具有风险规避行为时不同合作模式下的低碳供应链博弈模型,分别在不同合作模式下分析了制造商风险规避系数与消费者低碳偏好对模型结果的影响,进一步对比三种合作模式下风险规避系数对均衡结果的影响程度,探讨合作模式对供应链最优决策、经济绩效和环境绩效的影响。研究结果表明：(1)合作程度加深可以提高单位碳减排量和促销努力水平,进而增加产品的市场占有率及总碳减排量。(2)当促销性价比低于特定阈值时,制造商与零售商间的单领域合作能降低风险规避对单位碳减排的负面影响；但是,风险规避对促销努力水平的负面影响随二者间合作程度的加深而增强。(3)风险规避程度、零售商促销性价比以及制造商减排效率均会影响合作模式的选择。若制造商风险规避程度较低时,两种合作模式均能提高供应链总效用,且双领域合作为最优策略；若制造商风险规避程度较高,单领域合作是最稳定的最优策略或次优策略,双领域合作是否有利需要考虑合作双方的促销性价比与减排效率。 |
| 英文摘要 |
| Considering that manufacturers are risk-aversive in investing in emission reduction technologies, the cooperation between manufacturers and retailers in different fields is beneficial to improve the environmental performance of the supply chain. Therefore, according to the different degrees of collaboration, the cooperation modes are divided into the following three types: non-cooperation among supply chain members, single-field cooperation in low-carbon promotion, and dual-field cooperation in emission reduction pricing. The low-carbon supply chain game model is constructed under different cooperation modes when manufacturers have risk avoidance behaviors. We analyze the impact of the manufacturers’ risk aversion coefficient and consumers’ low-carbon preferences on the model results under different cooperation modes, further compare the effect of the risk aversion coefficient on the equilibrium results under the three cooperation modes, and discuss the impact of the cooperation degree on the optimal decision of the supply chain, economic performance, and environmental performance. The results show that (1) Deepening cooperation can improve unit carbon emission reduction and promotion efforts and increase product market share and total carbon emission reduction. (2) When the promotion cost-performance ratio is lower than a specific threshold, single-field cooperation between the manufacturer and the retailer can reduce the negative impact of risk aversion on unit carbon emission reduction; however, the negative effect of risk aversion on the level of promotion effort is enhanced with the deepening of the cooperation degree between them. (3) The degree of risk avoidance, the cost performance of retailers’ promotion, and the emission reduction efficiency of manufacturers will all affect the choice of cooperation mode. If the manufacturer’s risk avoidance degree is low, both cooperation modes can improve the total utility of the supply chain, and dual-domain cooperation is the best strategy. Single-field cooperation is the most stable optimal or second-best strategy if the manufacturer has a high-risk aversion. Whether the dual-field cooperation is beneficial must consider both partners’ promotion of cost-effectiveness and emission reduction efficiency. |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
|
|
