首页 | 新闻公告 | 投稿须知 | 编委会 | 关于杂志 | 订阅 | 留言FAQ | 广告服务 | 相关链接 | 下载区 | 联系我们

考虑组合融资与碳减排合作的供应链运作策略
Low carbon supply chain operation strategy considering combination financing and emission reduction cooperation
摘要点击 58  全文点击 0  投稿时间:2024-09-28  修订日期:2025-04-03
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  双边资金约束;组合融资;低碳供应链;减排合作
英文关键词  bilateral financial constraints; combination financing; low carbon supply chain; emission reduction cooperation
基金项目  
作者单位邮编
郭金森* 河南师范大学 商学院 453007
于春艳 河南师范大学 商学院 
周永务 华南理工大学 工商管理学院 
中文摘要
      为探究组合融资与减排合作对低碳供应链的影响,基于博弈理论分别构建无资金约束以及双边资金约束组合融资下低碳供应链独立和合作减排策略模型,讨论了消费者低碳偏好、减排成本因子等对供应链运作决策和利润的影响,并对最优决策结果进行比较分析。研究发现,不同模式下,随着消费者低碳偏好/减排成本因子的增加,独立减排或合作减排方式对企业碳减排水平、产品定价和利润的大小甚至变化方向均产生重要影响。与独立减排相比,在合作减排时供应商与制造商的减排水平、批发价格、销售价格、市场需求、供应商以及供应链的利润均更高,但制造商的利润下降。进一步,无论上下游企业独立减排还是合作减排,尽管资金约束困境对供应商和整个供应链利润会产生不利影响,但对制造商来说并非始终是有害的,一定条件下制造商能获取更多利润。
英文摘要
      To explore the impact of combination financing and emission reduction cooperation on low carbon supply chain, based on game theory, independent and cooperative low-carbon emission reduction strategy models were constructed under both non financial constraints and bilateral financial constraints, the optimal decision results were compared and analyzed. Research results show that under different modes, independent or cooperative emission reduction methods have a significant impact on the carbon reduction level, product pricing, and profits of enterprises. Compared with independent emission reduction, in cooperative emission reduction, the emission reduction levels, wholesale price, sales price, market demand, supplier and supply chain profits are higher, but the profits of manufacturer decrease. Furthermore, although financial constraints can have adverse effects on supplier and the entire supply chain profits, they are not always harmful to manufacturer. Under certain conditions, manufacturer can obtain more profits.
关闭

版权所有 © 2007 《系统工程学报》
通讯地址:天津市卫津路92号天津大学25教学楼A区908室 邮编:300072
联系电话/传真:022-27403197 电子信箱: jse@tju.edu.cn